Reddick Management Corp. et al v. Omaha, City of et al

Filing 51

ORDER- THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The joint motion to dismiss all of the plaintiffs' complaint against Paul Kratz, in his official capacity, Michelle Peters, in her individual and official capacities and Brook Bench, in his individual and official capacities, Filing No. 50 , is granted with prejudice, each party to bear its respective costs. The defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 47 is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA REDDICK MANAGEMENT CORP., and KEVIN REDDICK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Owner of Reddick Management Corp.; Plaintiffs, 8:16CV99 ORDER v. CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, PAUL KRATZ, in his Official Capacity; MICHELLE PETERS, in her Individual and Official Capacities; and BROOK BENCH, in his Individual and Official Capacities; Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties’ joint motion to dismiss all of the plaintiffs’ complaint against Paul Kratz, in his official capacity, Michelle Peters, in her individual and official capacities and Brook Bench, in his individual and official capacities, such dismissal to be with prejudice, each party to bear its respective costs. Filing No. 50. The court will grant the joint motion to dismiss. The defendants’ motion to dismiss, Filing No. 47 will be denied as moot. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The joint motion to dismiss all of the plaintiffs’ complaint against Paul Kratz, in his official capacity, Michelle Peters, in her individual and official capacities and Brook Bench, in his individual and official capacities, Filing No. 50, is granted with prejudice, each party to bear its respective costs. 2. The defendants’ motion to dismiss, Filing No. 47 is denied as moot. Dated this 6th day of February, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?