Coutts v. Kearney County, Nebraska et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion (Filing No. 10 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES A. COUTTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) KEARNEY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, ) SHERIFF SCOTT WHITE, DEPUTY ) SHANE MONTHEY, DEPUTY ) COREY ZIOLA, and DEPUTY ) JUSTIN GLANZER, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 8:16CV121 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff, who is an inmate at the Nebraska State Penitentiary, was previously given leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Filing No. 7.) The court’s IFP order advised Plaintiff that the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires that prisoner plaintiffs pay the full amount of the court’s $350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the court, even if the prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The order informed Plaintiff that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of Plaintiff’s average monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. Plaintiff was further advised that in addition to the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff must make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). On June 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court modify its IFP order to reflect that Plaintiff should only be required to pay 20 percent of the preceding month’s earned income, not money credited to Plaintiff’s account as a gift. (Filing No. 10.) Plaintiff’s contention that gifts from his family should be excluded as income for purposes of calculating his payments under the Act is without merit. Income under the Prison Litigation Reform Act includes “all deposits to the prisoner’s inmate account, whether the deposit be earned income, a gift, or otherwise.” Cosby v. Meadors, 351 F.3d 1324 (10th Cir. 2003). Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Filing No. 10) is denied. DATED this 27th day of June, 2016. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?