Hartmann Hay Company, LLC v. Wilbur-Ellis Company
Filing
55
ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: The Report and Recommendation of Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Thomas L. Saladino, Filing No. 54, is adopted in its entirety. The statutory reference of bankruptcy under 28 U.S.C. § 157 is withdrawn. The referral of this case to Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska is withdrawn. All proceedings in this matter are stayed until such time as the plaintiff or other appropriate party in interest obtains an order of the bankruptcy court authorizing the employment of the plaintiff's attorney to proceed with the litigation in district court. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HARTMANN HAY COMPANY, LLC,
Plaintiff,
8:16CV123
v.
ORDER
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY,
Defendant.
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY, a California
Corporation;
8:16CV125
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
KENT HARTMANN, an individual;
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of Chief U.S.
Bankruptcy Court Judge Thomas L. Salandino, Filing No. 54.
The court finds that
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 157(d) and NEGenR 1.5(b)(2) and for good cause shown that
the Report and Recommendation should be adopted in its entirety.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Report and Recommendation of Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge
Thomas L. Saladino, Filing No. 54, is adopted in its entirety;
2. The statutory reference of bankruptcy under 28 U.S.C. § 157 is withdrawn.
3. The referral of this case to Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska is
withdrawn. All proceedings in this matter are stayed until such time as the plaintiff or
other appropriate party in interest obtains an order of the bankruptcy court authorizing
the employment of the plaintiff’s attorney to proceed with the litigation in district court.
Dated this 14th day of June, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?