Fire Insurance Exchange v. General Electric Company et al
Filing
47
ORDER - The Joint Motion to Amend the Court's Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing No. 46 ) is granted. All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by December 1, 2017. Motio ns in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed by December 15, 2017, and accompanied by a request for a hearing if necessary. All remaining deadlines, including the Final Pretrial Conference and trial dates, remain unchanged. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a Nevada
foreign corporation;
8:16CV158
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Court’s Order
Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing No. 46). The parties request an extension
of certain deadlines due to difficulties in scheduling depositions. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Joint Motion to Amend the Court’s Order Setting Final Schedule for
Progression of Case (Filing No. 46) is granted;
2.
All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be
completed by December 1, 2017;
3.
Motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial
pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed by
December 15, 2017, and accompanied by a request for a hearing if necessary; and
4.
All remaining deadlines, including the Final Pretrial Conference and trial dates,
remain unchanged.
Dated this 12th day of September, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?