Evanston Insurance Company v. Prime Time HealthCare LLC

Filing 130

ORDER - The Court has reviewed the materials and concludes that they are, in fact, shielded from discovery by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine. Therefore, Plaintiff will not be ordered to produce these items. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

8:16CV159

vs.
ORDER
PRIME TIME HEALTHCARE LLC,
Defendant.
On February 13, 2018, the undersigned held a telephone conference with counsel of
record to discuss a discovery dispute that had arisen in this case. During the conference, the
parties advised that the discovery dispute had been resolved, with the exception that Defendants
disagreed that entries dated 12/28/15, 12/29/15, 12/30/15, 2/2/16, 2/26/16 and 3/22/16 were
privileged. Following the conference, Plaintiff was directed to submit the documents at issue to
the Court for in camera review. 1 Plaintiff submitted the documents as ordered.

The Court has reviewed the materials and concludes that they are, in fact, shielded from
discovery by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine. Therefore, Plaintiff will
not be ordered to produce these items.

Dated this 13th day of March, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge

1

The discovery dispute originally also involved privilege log entries dated 3/15/16 and
3/17/16. According to Defendants, Plaintiff agreed to provide unredacted copies of these
documents subject to an agreement that the production did not constitute a waiver of any
privilege or the work product doctrine. The Court does not know whether these documents were
ever produced. However, they were not included in the in camera production.