Valentine v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 65

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED:The Plaintiff will not be granted permission to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court's denial of her motions for summary judgment, because the Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 47 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 49 in Case No. 8:16cv174) denying the motions is not a final order or judgment and is not subject to appeal. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
VERONICA VALENTINE,
Plaintiff,

8:16CV131

vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHRIS BROWN, #1873; 8 UNKNOWN
JANE - JOHN DOE OMAHA POLICE
OFFICERS, THE CITY OF OMAHA, LISA
VILLWOK, AND #1764; and JENNIFER
HANSEN, #1585;
Defendants;
VERONICA VALENTINE,
Plaintiff,

8:16CV174

vs.
ORDER
CITY OF OMAHA, CHIEF OF OMAHA
POLICE SCHMADER, UNKNOWN JOHN
JANE DOE POLICE, LISA VILLWOK,
AND #1764; and JENNIFER HANSEN,
#1585;
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Clerk’s IFP Memos (ECF No. 52 in Case
No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 53 in Case No. 8:16cv174).
IT IS ORDERED:
The Plaintiff will not be granted permission to appeal in forma pauperis from the
Court’s denial of her motions for summary judgment, because the Memorandum and
Order (ECF No. 47 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 49 in Case No. 8:16cv174)
denying the motions is not a final order or judgment and is not subject to appeal.
Dated this 12th day of May, 2017.

BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

2