Valentine v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 74

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The Plaintiff will not be granted permission to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court's prior denial of her motion to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court's denial of her motion for summary judgment, because t he Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 47 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 49 in Case No. 8:16cv174) denying the motions is not a final order or judgment and is not subject to appeal. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA VERONICA VALENTINE, Plaintiff, 8:16CV131 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHRIS BROWN, #1873; 8 UNKNOWN JANE - JOHN DOE OMAHA POLICE OFFICERS, THE CITY OF OMAHA, LISA VILLWOK, AND #1764; and JENNIFER HANSEN, #1585; Defendants; VERONICA VALENTINE, Plaintiff, 8:16CV174 vs. ORDER CITY OF OMAHA, CHIEF OF OMAHA POLICE SCHMADER, UNKNOWN JOHN JANE DOE POLICE, LISA VILLWOK, AND #1764; and JENNIFER HANSEN, #1585; Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Clerk’s IFP Memos (ECF No. 72 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 73 in Case No. 8:16cv174). The Court previously denied the Plaintiff permission to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court’s denial of her motions for summary judgment because the Memorandum and Order, ECF No. 47 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 49 in Case No. 8:16cv174, denying the motions was not a final order or judgment subject to appeal. ECF No. 64 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 65 in Case No. 8:16cv174. The Plaintiff has appealed that decision to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and again requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will not grant the Plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED: The Plaintiff will not be granted permission to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court’s prior denial of her motion to appeal in forma pauperis from the Court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment, because the Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 47 in Case No. 8:16cv131 and ECF No. 49 in Case No. 8:16cv174) denying the motions is not a final order or judgment and is not subject to appeal. Dated this 31st day of May, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?