Petersen v. Bitters et al

Filing 97

ORDER - This matter is before the Court on defendant John L. Henry's (Henry) Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 95 ). On July 19, 2016, this Court entered an order explaining the Court would construe Henry's Notic e of Appeal as a motion to set aside the entry of default and default judgment (Filing No. 87 ) previously entered against Henry in this case. Because the Court construed Henry's Notice of Appeal as a motion to set aside the entry of default and default judgment, Henry's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 95 ) is DENIED as moot. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ESTATE OF JOYCE ROSAMOND
PETERSEN,
8:16CV183
Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

ROBERT W. BOLAND, JR.; UNITED
FINANCIAL SERVICES, WILLIAM E.
BITTERS; and JOHN L. HENRY,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on defendant John L. Henry’s (Henry) Motion for
Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 95). On July 19, 2016, this Court entered
an order explaining the Court would construe Henry’s Notice of Appeal as a motion to
set aside the entry of default and default judgment (Filing No. 87) previously entered
against Henry in this case. Because the Court construed Henry’s Notice of Appeal as a
motion to set aside the entry of default and default judgment, Henry’s Motion for Leave
to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 95) is DENIED as moot.

Dated this 28th day of July, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
United States District Judge