United States of America v. Stabl, Inc.. et al

Filing 84

ORDER - The Joint Motion to Deadlines and Request for a Planning Conference (Filing No. 83 in Case No. 8:16cv233; Filing No. 91 in Case No. 8:16cv351) is granted. The undersigned magistrate judge will hold a telephone Planning Conference on March 15, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. with counsel for all parties. A separate order will be entered with Case Conference Instructions. All case progression deadlines are stayed pending the entrance of an amended case progression schedule following the Planning Conference. Member Cases: 8:16-cv-00233-LSC-MDN, 8:16-cv-00351-LSC-MDN Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 8:16CV233 vs. ORDER STABL INC., LANT, INC., LEON JOHNSON, and ANN JOHNSON, Defendants. STATE OF NEBRASKA, 8:16CV351 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. STABL, INC., LANT, INC., LEON JOHNSON, and ANN JOHNSON, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines and Request for a Planning Conference (Filing No. 83 in Case No. 8:16cv233; Filing No. 91 in Case No. 8:16cv351). Having reviewed the joint motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Joint Motion to Deadlines and Request for a Planning Conference (Filing No. 83 in Case No. 8:16cv233; Filing No. 91 in Case No. 8:16cv351) is granted. 2. The undersigned magistrate judge will hold a telephone Planning Conference on March 15, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. with counsel for all parties. A separate order will be entered with Case Conference Instructions. 3. All case progression deadlines are stayed pending the entrance of an amended case progression schedule following the Planning Conference. Dated this 23rd day of February, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?