Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Reynolds et al
Filing
24
AMENDED ORDER - Plaintiff may deposit a check in the amount of $20,442.86 with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The Clerk is directed to deposit the aforementioned funds into an intere st-bearing account until further order of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2041 and NECivR 67.1. Upon payment of interplead funds totaling $20,442.86, Plaintiff, the benefit plan (The Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan), and the plan sponsor and employer (Burlington Northern Railroad) will be discharged from any further liability to Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (Copy e-mailed to Finance)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
8:16CV281
Plaintiff,
AMENDED ORDER
vs.
GAIL A. REYNOLDS, TAMI REYNOLDS,
LESLIE REYNOLDS, and PAUL
REYNOLDS,
Defendants.
Plaintiff's counsel has notified the Court that the amount of funds that need to be
deposited with the Clerk of Court has increased. Accordingly, the Order found at Filing No. 22
herein will be amended to reflect this change.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff may deposit a check in the amount of
$20,442.86 with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of
Nebraska. The Clerk is directed to deposit the aforementioned funds into an interest-bearing
account until further order of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2041 and NECivR 67.1. Upon
payment of interplead funds totaling $20,442.86, Plaintiff, the benefit plan (The Railroad
Employees National Health and Welfare Plan), and the plan sponsor and employer (Burlington
Northern Railroad) will be discharged from any further liability to Defendants.
Dated this 6th day of March, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?