Jones v. Clark

Filing 5

ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims t o determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. The Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Filing No. 2 , Part 2) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MARLIN E. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEBORAH CLARK, Executive
Director of Glen Haven Home,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:16CV347

ORDER

Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis. (Filing No. 2, Part 1.) Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the court finds
that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
(1) Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the
Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next
step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to
determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business.
(2) The Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Filing No. 2, Part
2) is denied.
DATED this 18th day of July, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge