Weis v. Triage Staffing, Inc.
Filing
21
AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER that the deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is December 1, 2016. The deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are: For the plaintiff(s): January 2, 2017. For the defendant(s): February 2, 2017. For plaintiff's rebuttal: March 2, 2017. The parties shall comply with all other deadlines recited in the Final Progression Order. (Filing No. 14 ). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
AMY WEIS,
Plaintiff,
8:16CV356
vs.
AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER
TRIAGE STAFFING, INC.,
Defendant.
Parties have filed a joint motion to amend the final progression order. (Filing No.
20).
IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order is amended as follows:
1)
The deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial,
(both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained
experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is December 1, 2016.
2)
The deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to
testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and
non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s):
For the defendant(s):
February 2, 2017.
For plaintiff’s rebuttal:
3)
January 2, 2017.
March 2, 2017.
The parties shall comply with all other deadlines recited in the Final
Progression Order. (Filing No. 14).
Dated this 26th day of October, 2016
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?