Weis v. Triage Staffing, Inc.

Filing 21

AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER that the deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is December 1, 2016. The deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are: For the plaintiff(s): January 2, 2017. For the defendant(s): February 2, 2017. For plaintiff's rebuttal: March 2, 2017. The parties shall comply with all other deadlines recited in the Final Progression Order. (Filing No. 14 ). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA AMY WEIS, Plaintiff, 8:16CV356 vs. AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER TRIAGE STAFFING, INC., Defendant. Parties have filed a joint motion to amend the final progression order. (Filing No. 20). IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order is amended as follows: 1) The deadline for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is December 1, 2016. 2) The deadline for complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are: For the plaintiff(s): For the defendant(s): February 2, 2017. For plaintiff’s rebuttal: 3) January 2, 2017. March 2, 2017. The parties shall comply with all other deadlines recited in the Final Progression Order. (Filing No. 14). Dated this 26th day of October, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?