Fleet Truck Sales, Inc. v. Quality Companies, LLC et al
Filing
117
ORDER granting 116 Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline and Move Trial Date. Plaintiff shall have an extension of time to August 10, 2018, to file a response to the Defendant Celadon Group, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment 113 . Celedon Group may file a reply seven days thereafter. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is rescheduled for November 26, 2018, at 11:00 a.m., in chambers, 111 South 18th Plaza, Suite 2210, Roman L. Hruska United Sta tes Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. The three day jury trial is rescheduled to commence, at the Court's call, during the week of December 11, 2018, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Laurie Smith Camp. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (MBM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
FLEET TRUCK SALES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
8:16CV366
vs.
ORDER
CELADON GROUP, INC., and QUALITY
COMPANIES, LLC,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline and Move
Trial Date (Filing No. 116). Upon review of the motion, and for good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Deadline and Move Trial Date (Filing No. 116) is
granted;
2. Plaintiff shall have an extension of time to August 10, 2018, to file a response to the
Defendant Celadon Group, Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No.
113). Celedon Group may file a reply seven days thereafter.
3. Pretrial Disclosures. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), each party shall serve
opposing counsel and file a redacted version as applicable with the following
information regarding the evidence it may present at trial other than solely for
impeachment purposes as soon as practicable but not later than the date specified:
a. Nonexpert Witnesses - On or before November 13, 2018: The name, address
and telephone number1 of each witness, separately identifying those whom the
party expects to present and those whom the party may call if the need arises.
b. Deposition Testimony and Discovery - The designation of discovery
testimony and discovery responses intended to be utilized at trial is not required
at this time.
1
In accordance with the E-Government Act, counsel shall, on witness lists, exhibits, and other disclosures
and/or documents filed with the Court, redact Social Security numbers, home addresses, telephone numbers, and
other personally identifying information of witnesses, but shall serve an unredacted version on opposing parties. See
NECivR 5.3.
c. Trial Exhibits - On or before November 13, 2018: A list of all exhibits it
expects to offer by providing a numbered listing and permitting examination of
such exhibits, designating on the list those exhibits it may offer only if the need
arises.
d. Waiver of Objections. Any and all objections to the use of the witnesses,
deposition testimony, discovery responses, or exhibits disclosed pursuant to the
above subparagraphs, including any objection pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)
that a deponent is available to testify at the trial, shall be made a part of the
pretrial order. Failure to list objections (except those under Fed. R. Evid. 402
and 403) is a waiver of such objections, unless excused by the Court for good
cause shown.
6. Any non-Daubert motions in limine shall be filed on or before November 19, 2018.
7. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is rescheduled
for November 26, 2018, at 11:00 a.m., in my chambers, 111 South 18th Plaza, Suite
2210, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska.
8. The three day jury trial is rescheduled to commence, at the Court’s call, during the
week of December 11, 2018, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Laurie
Smith Camp, Chief United States District Judge.
Dated this 20th day of July, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?