Brown v. Department of Health and Human Services et al

Filing 73

ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall terminate Plaintiff's Objection (Filing No. 71 ) as a pending motion, and docket such Objection as a Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 61 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MEE MEE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
COURTNEY PHILIPS, Director,
SHANNON BLACK, Program
Director, KYLE MALONE, SOS
Team Leader, WILLIAM BECKER,
Program Therapist, CINDY
DYKEMAN, Program Manager, and
LISA LAURELL, Program Social
Worker, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:16CV377

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed an “Objection” (Filing No. 71) to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Filing No. 61). NECivR 7.1(b)(1)(A) prohibits the filing of an
“objection” to a motion. Rather, a party must file a “brief that concisely states the
reasons for opposing the motion and cites to supporting authority.” NECivR
7.1(b)(1)(A). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate Plaintiff’s Objection
(Filing No. 71) as a pending motion, and docket such Objection as a Brief in
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 61).
DATED this 6th day of December, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge