Harris v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 369

SEVENTH AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER - The trial and pretrial conference remain as scheduled in the Trial Setting Order. (Filing No. 363 .) The non-expert deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral testimony only under Rule 45, is March 12, 2021. The expert deposition deadline is March 31, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)

8:16-cv-00381-JFB-SMB Doc # 369 Filed: 02/19/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 7108

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
QUINTON HARRIS,
Plaintiff,

8:16CV381

vs.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

SEVENTH AMENDED FINAL
PROGRESSION ORDER

Defendant.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines.
(Filing No. 368.) The motion is granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court’s previous Final Progression Orders remain
in effect, and in addition to those provisions, shall be amended as follows:
1)

The trial and pretrial conference remain as scheduled in the Trial Setting Order.
(Filing No. 363.)

2)

The deadline for plaintiff(s) to serve any expert reports in rebuttal to those served by
defendant(s) after January 7, 2021 is March 1, 2021.

3)

The non-expert deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral
testimony only under Rule 45, is March 12, 2021. The expert deposition deadline is
March 31, 2021.

4)

The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is May
14, 2021. The deadline for the responding party to reply is June 4, 2021.

5)

The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds
is March 26, 2021.

6)

The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their
Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order.

7)

All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to
the undersigned magistrate judge. Such requests will not be considered absent a
showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent
development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which
require that additional time be allowed.

Dated this 19th day of February, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge