English v. Methodist Healthcare System et al
Filing
5
ORDER - that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LAWAN J. ENGLISH,
Plaintiff,
v.
METHODIST HEALTHCARE
SYSTEM, MD DARREN KEISER,
PA SEAN BIGLER, PHYSICIANS
CLINIC, TIME WARNER CABLE,
Charter Communications, ESIS AGL
SOUTH CENTRAL HUB, ESIS
Central WC Claims, KELLY
HEMAM, ESIS Supervisor Claims
Adjuster, and KIMBERLY STINE,
ESIS Claims Adjuster,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:16CV427
ORDER
Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis.
(Filing No. 2.) Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the court finds that Plaintiff is
financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees.
Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial
review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of
business.
DATED this 12th day of September, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?