The Buckle, Inc. v. Mannington Mills, Inc. et al

Filing 60

AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER granting 58 and 59 Motions to Amend. Deadlines are amended as stated herein. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA THE BUCKLE, INC., a Nebraska corporation; 8:16CV432 Plaintiff, AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER vs. MANNINGTON MILLS, INC., a New Jersey corporation; and LARRY MITHELMAN, an individual; Defendants. The Defendant Mannington Mills, Inc. has filed an unopposed motion to amend certain deadlines. (Filing No. 58). The defendant subsequently filed an amended unopposed motion encompassing the same requests for deadline amendment. (Filing No. 59). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order (Filing No. 36) is amended as follows: 1) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33 through 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is February 15, 2018. Motions to compel Rule 33 through 36 discovery must be filed by March 1, 2018. Note: Motions to compel shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute. 2) Defendants' complete expert disclosures shall be served on or before November 15, 2017. 3) The deposition deadlines are: For fact witnesses: February 15, 2018. For expert witnesses: April 15, 2018. 4) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is May 30, 2018. 5) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is May 30, 2018. 6) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order. Dated this 27th day of September, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?