Perez v. Apex Delivery Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER - that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery (Filing No. #27 ) is granted. Apex shall provide full and complete responses to Plaintiff's first set of interrogatories and document production requests by March 27, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor; 8:16CV471 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. APEX DELIVERY SOLUTIONS, INC., and KEVIN M. FIENHOLD, individually; Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery. (Filing No. 27.) Defendants have not responded to the motion. Plaintiff served its first set of interrogatories and document production requests upon Defendant Apex Delivery Solutions, Inc. (“Apex”) on June 27, 2017. (Filing No. 16.) In response to several of the interrogatories, Apex responded by stating that it would supplement or that “investigation continues.” (Filing No. 27-1.) Similarly, in response to the document production requests, Apex indicated that it was assembling documents and that it would supplement several requests. (Filing No. 27-2.) According to Plaintiff, despite numerous attempts, it still has not been provided complete responses to its discovery requests. Apex has acknowledged that it has supplemental discovery materials it needs to produce. However, to the Court’s knowledge, it has yet to do so. Plaintiff is clearly entitled to complete discovery responses. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery (Filing No. 27) is granted. Apex shall provide full and complete responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and document production requests by March 27, 2018. Dated this 20th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?