Sepulveda-Rodriguez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 102

ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Eighth Circuit), Filing No. #101 . The action was remanded for further consideration of the attorney fee award fee award in light of the results the plaintiff obtained against Ford and for consideration of whether it is appropriate to award the equitable remedy of a return of the life insurance premiums paid by plaintiffs decedent during his employment with Ford. The Court finds briefing on those issues is appropriate. Accordingly, The parties shall file briefs on the above issues within one week of the date of this order The parties shall file responsive briefs within one week thereafter. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SILVIA SEPULVEDA-RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, 8:16CV507 vs. ORDER METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corporation; and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Eighth Circuit), Filing No. 101. The action was remanded for further consideration of the attorney fee award fee award in light of the results the plaintiff obtained against Ford and for consideration of whether it is appropriate to award the equitable remedy of a return of the life insurance premiums paid by plaintiff’s decedent during his employment with Ford. The Court finds briefing on those issues is appropriate. Accordingly, 1. The parties shall file briefs on the above issues within one week of the date of this order 2. The parties shall file responsive briefs within one week thereafter. Dated this 3rd day of October, 2019. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?