Dubray v. Hansen

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The petition for writ of habeas corpus (filing no. 1 ) is denied without prejudice. Taking the prison mailbox rule into account, on or before January 9, 2017, Petitioner shall file an amended petition using AO Form 241. Petiti oner shall state his claim(s) and supporting fact(s) concisely and without argument or legal citation. That can normally be done using the form itself without attachments. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DOMINICK DUBRAY, Petitioner, v. BRAD HANSEN, Warden of the Tecumseh State Correctional Institution, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:16CV517 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The petition for habeas corpus in this case does not substantially comply with the form required by Rule 2(d) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. Among other problems, the petition is far too argumentative. It also attempts to incorporate by reference “the entire record.” I will allow Petitioner to file an amended petition. I strongly encourage Petitioner not to “throw mud against the wall” in the hopes that something might stick. Also, it is almost always true that claims having many sub-parts are unpersuasive. IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (filing no. 1) is denied without prejudice. 2. Taking the prison mailbox rule into account, on or before January 9, 2017,1 Petitioner shall file an amended petition using AO Form 241. Petitioner shall state his claim(s) and supporting fact(s) concisely and without argument or legal citation. That can normally be done using the form itself without attachments. DATED this 5th day of December, 2016. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 1 This means the amended petition must be received by the Clerk no later than Monday, January 9, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?