Wilson et al v. Geerdes et al

Filing 101

AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER - The deposition deadline is now January 31, 2019. Cross-motions for summary judgment based on stipulated facts shall be filed on or before March 14, 2019, with any response due on or before April 15, 2019. No reply shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is now March 14, 2019. The clerk shall set an internal case management deadline of March 18, 2019: Confirm that cross-motions were timely filed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA HAROLD BRYAN WILSON, and RILEY NICOLE SHADLE, 8:16CV524 Plaintiffs, PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) vs. JASON GEERDES, in their Official Capacity; SCOTT FRAKES, Director, in their Official Capacity; TAGGART BOYD, Warden, in their Official Capacity; and MICHELE CAPPS, in her official capacity as Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary; Defendants. The parties filed a Joint Motion to Amend Progression Order (Filing No. 100), requesting an extension of certain progression deadlines set in Filing No. 84, or amended in Filing No. 94. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The deposition deadline is now January 31, 2019. 2) Cross-motions for summary judgment based on stipulated facts shall be filed on or before March 14, 2019, with any response due on or before April 15, 2019. No reply shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. 3) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is now March 14, 2019. 4) The clerk shall set an internal case management deadline of March 18, 2019: Confirm that cross-motions were timely filed. Dated this 28th day of December, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?