Meyer et al v. Currie Tech Corp. et al

Filing 63

ORDER - Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 39(d) to state whether 16 C.F.R. § 1512 applies to the conversion kit at issue. Defendants shall also state who is responsible for determining whether that section applies t o the conversion kit and the basis for that individual's opinion as to the applicability of that section. Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 40 to identify their consumer complaint and conversion kit return process, who performed this process (dealt with consumer complaints and/or returns related to the conversion kits), whether any records exist regarding consumer complaints and/or returns, and what happened to conversion kits that were returned. Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 43. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARCIE MEYER, an Individual; and MICHAEL MEYER, an Individual; 8:16CV542 Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. CURRIE TECH CORP., a Delaware Corporation; and ACCELL NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Defendants. A telephone conference was held on today’s date to discuss a discovery dispute. Following discussion of the matter, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 39(d) to state whether 16 C.F.R. § 1512 applies to the conversion kit at issue. Defendants shall also state who is responsible for determining whether that section applies to the conversion kit and the basis for that individual’s opinion as to the applicability of that section. 2. Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 40 to identify their consumer complaint and conversion kit return process, who performed this process (dealt with consumer complaints and/or returns related to the conversion kits), whether any records exist regarding consumer complaints and/or returns, and what happened to conversion kits that were returned. 3. Defendants shall supplement their response to Interrogatory No. 43. Dated this 19th day of April, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?