Shadle v. Frakes et al

Filing 60

ORDER that Plaintiff's pro se motion to amend 31 is denied without prejudice to re-filing an amended complaint with the assistance of Plaintiff's court-appointed counsel. Plaintiff's motion to strike 44 is granted, and her motion f or change of housing 43 is denied without prejudice to re-asserting if her housing becomes inappropriate under constitutional standards or is inconsistent with the institution's current or future policies. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MBM)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RILEY NICOLE SHADLE, Plaintiff, 8:16CV546 vs. ORDER SCOTT FRAKES, sued in both their individual and official capacities, et. al; Defendants. After conferring with counsel, and for the reasons stated on the record, (Filing No. 59), IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff’s pro se motion to amend, (Filing No. 31), is denied without prejudice to re-filing an amended complaint with the assistance of Plaintiff’s court-appointed counsel. 2) Plaintiff motion to strike, (Filing No. 44), is granted, and her motion for change of housing, (Filing No. 43), is denied without prejudice to re-asserting if her housing becomes inappropriate under constitutional standards or is inconsistent with the institution’s current or future policies. September 19, 2017 BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?