Bartunek v. Omaha Police Department et al

Filing 27

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Progression Order (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GREGORY P. BARTUNEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF OMAHA, DAVID PECHA, ) ) MICHELELE BANG, MARK ) DESLER, TODD SCHMADERER, MICHELLE PETERS, ROSEMARIE ) ) LEE, PAUL KRATZ, and JEAN ) STOTHERT, ) ) Defendants. 8:16CV568 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Progression Order (Filing No. 26). Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a progression order as the Defendants “have had ample time to answer.” Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 22) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A progression order will be issued pursuant to NECivR 16.1(c), if necessary, after the Court rules on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Progression Order (Filing No. 26) is denied. DATED: March 20, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ F.A. Gossett, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?