Bartunek v. Omaha Police Department et al

Filing 27

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Progression Order (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
GREGORY P. BARTUNEK,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT,
CITY OF OMAHA, DAVID PECHA, )
)
MICHELELE BANG, MARK
)
DESLER, TODD SCHMADERER,
MICHELLE PETERS, ROSEMARIE )
)
LEE, PAUL KRATZ, and JEAN
)
STOTHERT,
)
)
Defendants.

8:16CV568
ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Progression Order (Filing
No. 26). Plaintiff requests that the Court enter a progression order as the Defendants
“have had ample time to answer.” Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss (Filing No.
22) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A progression
order will be issued pursuant to NECivR 16.1(c), if necessary, after the Court rules on
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Progression Order (Filing No. 26) is
denied.

DATED: March 20, 2017.

BY THE COURT:
s/ F.A. Gossett, III
United States Magistrate Judge