Bartunek v. Omaha Police Department et al

Filing 8

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Engage in Discovery (Filing No. 7 ) is denied, without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GREGORY P. BARTUNEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF OMAHA, DAVID PECHA, ) ) MICHELELE BANG, MARK ) DESLER, TODD SCHMADERER, MICHELLE PETERS, ROSEMARIE ) ) LEE, PAUL KRATZ, and JEAN ) STOTHERT, ) ) Defendants. 8:16CV568 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Engage in Discovery (Filing No. 7). Plaintiff requests permission to engage in discovery prior to the entry of the initial progression order. However, there is no evidence that any of the defendants have been properly notified of this action by service of a summons and copy of the complaint as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff’s motion for discovery, therefore, is premature. Plaintiff may want to review this district’s resources for pro se individuals for information regarding self-representation in this court, found at: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Engage in Discovery (Filing No. 7) is denied, without prejudice. DATED: January 4, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?