Gary v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 22, 2017: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MONTE C. GARY, Plaintiff, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., and BOB NIELSEN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:17CV7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. On January 10, 2017, the clerk of the court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last-known address. (Filing No. 5.) On February 1, 2017, the order was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 6.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: February 22, 2017: deadline for informing court of address. DATED this 2nd day of February, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?