ROP, Inc. v. KenBrooke Roofing, Inc.
Filing
38
ORDER - 1) Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom Construction, Inc. is given until August 31, 2017 to either file a fully completed corporate disclosure statement or show cause why the statement cannot be filed. 2) The failure to timely comply with this order may result in an entry and/or judgment of default against Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom Construction, Inc. without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ROP, INC., a Nevada corporation;
Plaintiff,
8:17CV24
vs.
ORDER
KENBROOKE ROOFING, INC., a
Nebraska corporation;
Defendant.
On May 25, 2017, the Clerk notified Third Party Defendant Integrity
Custom Construction, Inc. of its obligation to filed a corporate disclosure
statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Having received no response, the
Clerk emailed a reminder to counsel for Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom
Construction, Inc. on July 11, 2017, and on August 7, 2017.
The August
reminder warned that a show cause order will be entered is the corporate
disclosure statement is not filed by August 14, 2017. To date, the corporate
disclosure for Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom Construction, Inc. has not
been filed, and counsel has not explained the failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 7.1.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom Construction, Inc. is given
until August 31, 2017 to either file a fully completed corporate disclosure
statement or show cause why the statement cannot be filed.
2)
The failure to timely comply with this order may result in an entry
and/or judgment of default against Third Party Defendant Integrity Custom
Construction, Inc. without further notice.
August 21, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?