Johnson v. Frakes

Filing 28

ORDER - The Petitioner James D. Johnson, but only the Petitioner James D.Johnson, is given leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Request That Circuit Judge or Judges Issue the Requisite Certificate of Appealability filed by James D. Johnson (Filing No. 24 ) is referred to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of filing no. 24 to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and term the motion. The motion to intervene (filing no. 20 ), the motion for class action certification and to appoint counsel (filing no. 21 ), and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (filing No. 22 ) submitted by William James Bland are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se parties) (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES D. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. SCOTT R. FRAKES, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Director, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:17CV39 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Petitioner James D. Johnson, but only the Petitioner James D. Johnson, is given leave to appeal in forma pauperis. (2) The Request That Circuit Judge or Judges Issue the Requisite Certificate of Appealability filed by James D. Johnson (Filing No. 24) is referred to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of filing no. 24 to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and term the motion. (3) The motion to intervene (filing no. 20), the motion for class action certification and to appoint counsel (filing no. 21), and the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (filing No. 22) submitted by William James Bland are denied. DATED this 30th day of March, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?