Nahkahyen-Clearsand v. Department of Health & Human Services et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER this action is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's request for counsel (Filing No. 10) is denied. The court will enter judgment by separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHAWNN ERICK NAHKAHYENCLEARSAND, 8:17CV43 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, DENNIS CONNOLLY, Dr., In Their Individual and Official Capacities; and THERESA HANSEN, RN, In Their Individual and Official Capacities; Defendants. This matter is before the court on review of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. (Filing No. 9.) Plaintiff also renews his request for the appointment of counsel. (Filing No. 10.) The court granted Plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint to correct several deficiencies in his Complaint so that he can state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (See Filing No. 8.) Instead of correcting those deficiencies in his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff essentially repeats the allegations from his Complaint and, therefore, this action will be dismissed. Further, the court cannot routinely appoint counsel in civil cases. In Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals explained that “[i]ndigent civil litigants do not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel.” Trial courts have “broad discretion to decide whether both the plaintiff and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel, taking into account the factual and legal complexity of the case, the presence or absence of conflicting testimony, and the plaintiff’s ability to investigate the facts and present his claim.” Id. Having considered these factors, the request for the appointment of counsel will be denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff’s request for counsel (Filing No. 10) is denied. 3. The court will enter judgment by separate document. Dated this 18th day of May, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?