Mick v. Wade et al
Filing
16
ORDER that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 10, 2017: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STEVEN E. MICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHEN WADE JR. and
DOUGLAS COUNTY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:17CV147
ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 1, 2017, the clerk
of the court sent an order to Plaintiff at his last-known address. (Filing No. 10.) On
September 15, 2017, the order was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no
forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 14.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep
the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g)
(requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes
within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts
remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of
this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of
which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The
clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using
the following text: October 10, 2017: deadline for informing court of address.
DATED this 20th day of September, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?