Johnson v. Frakes et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JEREMY L. JOHNSON,
Petitioner,
8:17CV191
vs.
SCOT FRAKES, Director; and BRAD
HANSEN, Warden;
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Respondents.
Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1) and a
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2). Habeas corpus
cases attacking the legality of a person’s confinement require the payment of a
$5.00 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). However, after considering Petitioner’s
financial status as shown in the records of this court (see inmate trust account
statement at Filing No. 3), leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and
Petitioner is relieved from paying the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2) is granted. The next step in this case is
for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in
accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will
conduct this review in its normal course of business.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?