Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad

Filing 21

PROGRESSION ORDER: This case involves the enforcement of an arbitration award. Based on the parties' Rule 26(f) Report, (Filing No. 18), the Court's review of this case will be limited to that sole issue and will be resolved by cross-mo tions for dismissal, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: This case will be resolved by cross-motions for dismissal. The deadline for Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is November 13, 2017. Defendant's responding brief shall be filed on Dec ember 14, 2017. Plaintiff's reply brief in support shall be filed by January 3, 2018. The deadline for Defendant's cross motion for dismissal is December 14, 2017. Plaintiff's responding brief shall be filed by January 3, 2018. Defendant's reply brief shall be filed on January 24, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT, 8:17CV269 Plaintiff, PROGRESSION ORDER vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, Defendant. This case involves the enforcement of an arbitration award. Based on the parties’ Rule 26(f) Report, (Filing No. 18), the Court's review of this case will be limited to that sole issue and will be resolved by cross-motions for dismissal, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) This case will be resolved by cross-motions for dismissal. a. The deadline for Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is November 13, 2017. Defendant’s responding brief shall be filed on December 14, 2017. Plaintiff’s reply brief in support shall be filed by January 3, 2018. b. The deadline for Defendant’s cross motion for dismissal is December 14, 2017. Plaintiff’s responding brief shall be filed by January 3, 2018. Defendant’s reply brief shall be filed on January 24, 2018. Dated this 13th day of November, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?