Teague, et al v. Regent Financial Group, Inc., et al

Filing 17

ORDER - that Plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint to bring a claim on behalf of Lighting the Path Christian Trust (instead of in their own capacities), (Filing No. 16 ), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ED TEAGUE II, and DIANNA L. SHOULTS, 8:17CV302 Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. REGENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., et. al, Defendants. Plaintiffs have filed a pro se motion to amend their complaint to substitute Lighting the Path Christian Trust as the named plaintiff. Plaintiffs ask to file their amended complaint pro se and as trustees for the Trust. (Filing No. 16). Lighting the Path Christian Trust, a trust, cannot litigate its action in this forum without representation by licensed counsel. Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck, 20 F.3d 347, 347-48 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint to bring a claim on behalf of Lighting the Path Christian Trust (instead of in their own capacities), (Filing No. 16), is denied. September 12, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?