Wallace v. Yanez et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 25, 2017: check for address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MLF, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA FLOYD L. WALLACE, JR., Plaintiff, 8:17CV305 vs. NICOLAS YANEZ, 1506; BRIAN DIMINICON, 1988; WILLIAN SEATON, 1761; and OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the court on its own motion. On August 17, 2017, the clerk of the court sent orders to Plaintiff at his last known address and they were returned to this court as undeliverable. (See Filing Nos. 6, 7.) On September 15, 2017, Plaintiff called the clerk’s office and stated that he would come to the clerk’s office on September 18th to retrieve the documents and to update his mailing address. To date, Plaintiff has not taken either action. Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff must update his address within 30 days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 2. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 25, 2017: check for address. Dated this 25th day of September, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?