Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County, Nebraska et al

Filing 5

ORDER - This matter is before the court on its own motion. Accordingly, the plaintiff shall effectuate service and notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1. Upon effectuation of such notice, the plaintiff shall contact the chambers of the undersigned to set a hearing for a status conference at which all parties will discuss progression of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, 8:17CV328 v. ORDER 80 ACRES OF LAND IN THURSTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PATRICIA E. ABATANGELO, also known as Patricia Pettit Solomon, CORA N. SOLOMON, MARIANNE SOLOMON WIGGANS, CHRISTINE MARIE SOLOMON, KATHERINE SOLOMON, WILBUR SOLOMON, MICHAEL ANDREW SOLOMON, NOLAN J. SOLOMON, and UNKNOWN OWNERS, Defendants. This matter is before the court on its own motion. This is an action for condemnation under 25 U.S.C. § 357. Jurisdiction is based on a federal question under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 71.1 governs all proceedings to condemn real or personal property, including actions involving eminent domain under state law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.1(a), (k). “[E]xcept for the issue of whether a jury may hear the case, a federal court hearing a condemnation case under a state's power of eminent domain must follow the procedures in Rule 71A [later renamed Rule 71.1].” City of Arlington, Tex. v. Golddust Twins Realty Corp., 41 F.3d 960, 964 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1994); see Village of Walthill, Neb. v. Iowa Elec. Light & Power, 228 F.2d 647, 653 (8th Cir. 1956) (stating that Rule 71A (k) [now 71.1(k)] mandates that, except for the issue of whether a jury may hear the case, a federal court hearing a condemnation case under a state's power of eminent domain must follow the procedures in the Federal Rules); EQT Gathering, LLC v. A Tract of Prop. Situated in Knott Cty., Ky., No. CIV. A. 12-58-ART, 2012 WL 6049691, at *2 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 5, 2012). Accordingly, the plaintiff shall effectuate service and notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1(d)(1), “[o]n filing a complaint, the plaintiff must promptly deliver to the clerk joint or several notices directed to the named defendants.” Also, “[w]hen a defendant whose address is known resides within the United States or a territory subject to the administrative or judicial jurisdiction of the United States, personal service of the notice (without a copy of the complaint) must be made in accordance with Rule 4.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.1(d)(3)(A).1 Upon effectuation of such notice, the plaintiff shall contact the chambers of the undersigned to set a hearing for a status conference at which all parties will discuss progression of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 12th day of September, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge 1 Service by publication may be effected under Rule 71.1 (d)(3)(B). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?