Swift (Nee) Hill et al v. Osler

Filing 5

ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se parties) (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ARNETTA SWIFT (NEE) HILL, and CHARLES SWIFT, 8:17CV440 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER vs. BRENDA OSLER, Defendant. Plaintiffs, non-prisoners, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Filing No. 2.) Upon review of Plaintiffs’ Motion, the court finds that Plaintiffs are financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiffs are advised that the next step in their case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of their claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Dated this 20th day of November, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 1 The court notes that co-Plaintiff, Charles Swift, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate pending civil action, Swift v. Williams, Case No. 8:17CV331.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?