Clark v. Nebraska Department of Correction's et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that because Plaintiff has now submitted his initial partial filing fee, the court will conduct, in its normal course of business, an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JEROME M. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION’S, MICKIE BAUM, Record’s Administrator, VAL GRANHOLM, Records, SCOTT FRAKES, Prison Director, and PETE RICKETES, Govenor, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:17CV447 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On January 9, 2018, Plaintiff was granted 30 days to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee of $3.43. (Filing No. 9.) Plaintiff failed to show cause, but a partial filing fee in the amount of $15.12 was submitted on Plaintiff’s behalf on February 9, 2018. Therefore, the next step in Plaintiff’s case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. IT IS ORDERED that because Plaintiff has now submitted his initial partial filing fee, the court will conduct, in its normal course of business, an initial review of Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). DATED this 13th day of February, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?