Chapman v. Hartmann et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, 8:17CV460 vs. KLAUS HARTMANN, M.D. in Official and/or individual Capacity; and LINCOLN REGIONAL CENTER, in Official and/or indiviual Capacity; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendants. On December 26, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff to update his address with the court within 30 days or face dismissal of this action. To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address or taken any other action in this matter.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute it diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders. The court will enter judgment by a separate document. Dated this 6th day of February, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 1 Plaintiff also was ordered to update his address on December 26, 2017, in another of his pending cases in this court, Chapman v. Douglas County Department of Corrections et al., Case No. 8:17CV465. (Filing No. 9, Case No. 8:17CV465.) In both the present case and 8:17CV465, a copy of the December 26, 2017 Memorandum and Order was mailed to Plaintiff’s last known address and to the Lincoln Regional Center. (Filing No. 6, Case No. 8:17CV460; Filing No. 9, Case No. 8:17CV465.) Plaintiff gave notice of his current address in 8:17CV465, but not in the present case. Thus, Plaintiff appears to have decided not to prosecute this matter further.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?