Clayborne v. City of lincoln, Lincoln Police Department et al
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Request for 60 days Extension of Time (filing no. 36 ) is denied as moot. Defendants shall have until March 15, 2019, to file a reply brief. The clerk of the court is directed to set the follow pro se case management deadline using the following text: March 15, 2019: check for Defendants' reply. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ROBERT EARL CLAYBORNEJR.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PARKER, Officer, #1577, Individual
Capacity; JAMES, Sgt, #1370,
Individual Capacity; CHAD HEIN,
Officer, #1552, Individual Capacity;
RIPLEY, Officer, #1256, Individual
Capacity; MESSERSMITH, Officer,
#1568, Individual Capacity;
KOUNOVSKY, Officer, #1593,
Individual Capacity; and
SUNDERMEIER, Captain, #717,
Individual Capacity;
8:17CV481
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Request
for 60 days Extension of Time. (Filing No. 36.) Plaintiff asks to withdraw his
previous request for an extension (filing no. 34) because he is ready to submit his
brief in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (filing no. 30). Plaintiff filed
his brief (filing no. 37) and an exhibit index (filing no. 38) on March 5, 2019.
Because the court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension prior to his motion to
withdraw his request,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Request for 60 days Extension of
Time (filing no. 36) is denied as moot.
2.
Defendants shall have until March 15, 2019, to file a reply brief.
3.
The clerk of the court is directed to set the follow pro se case
management deadline using the following text: March 15, 2019: check for
Defendants’ reply.
Dated this 8th day of March, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?