Strong v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. - US Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust et al
Filing
40
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (filing 39 ) is granted. The plaintiff may respond to Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. and Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee's motion to dismiss (filing 32 ) on or before April 23, 2018. The defendants may reply in support of their motion on or before April 30, 2018. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MIKE K. STRONG,
Plaintiff,
8:17-CV-485
vs.
ORDER
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., et
al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's Motion for Extension
of Time (filing 39). The motion will be granted.
The Court notes the plaintiff's complaints about not receiving certain
filings. Filing 38; filing 39. Both filings were represented in the certificate of
service as having been mailed to the plaintiff. Filing 29 at 2; filing 32 at 3.
And the Court has absolutely no reason not to believe that the filings were
mailed, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2). Nonetheless, all the parties are
reminded of their obligation to provide proper non-electronic service on the
plaintiff. See NECivR 5.2(b). And, the Court notes, while the rules do not
required certified or registered mail, the use of those services can prevent
disagreements about whether or not proper service was effected.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (filing 39) is
granted.
2.
The plaintiff may respond to Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. and
Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee's
motion to dismiss (filing 32) on or before April 23, 2018.
3.
The defendants may reply in support of their motion on or
before April 30, 2018.
Dated this 2nd day of April, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?