Strong v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. - US Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust et al

Filing 40

ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (filing 39 ) is granted. The plaintiff may respond to Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. and Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee's motion to dismiss (filing 32 ) on or before April 23, 2018. The defendants may reply in support of their motion on or before April 30, 2018. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MIKE K. STRONG, Plaintiff, 8:17-CV-485 vs. ORDER CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (filing 39). The motion will be granted. The Court notes the plaintiff's complaints about not receiving certain filings. Filing 38; filing 39. Both filings were represented in the certificate of service as having been mailed to the plaintiff. Filing 29 at 2; filing 32 at 3. And the Court has absolutely no reason not to believe that the filings were mailed, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2). Nonetheless, all the parties are reminded of their obligation to provide proper non-electronic service on the plaintiff. See NECivR 5.2(b). And, the Court notes, while the rules do not required certified or registered mail, the use of those services can prevent disagreements about whether or not proper service was effected. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (filing 39) is granted. 2. The plaintiff may respond to Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C. and Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee's motion to dismiss (filing 32) on or before April 23, 2018. 3. The defendants may reply in support of their motion on or before April 30, 2018. Dated this 2nd day of April, 2018. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?