Davis v. Ak-Sar-Ben Village, L.L.C.

Filing 69

AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER - that the final progression order (Filing No. 56 ) is amended as follows: The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is September 9, 2019. Motions to co mpel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by September 23, 2019. The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in the courts final progression order (Filing No. 56 ) and their Rule 26(f) planning report th at are not inconsistent with this order. All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be consider ed absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LKO)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MELANIE DAVIS,
Plaintiff,

8:18CV101

vs.
AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER
AK-SAR-BEN VILLAGE, L.L.C.,
Defendant.

IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order (Filing No. 56) is amended as
follows:

1)

The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is September 9, 2019. Motions to
compel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by September 23,
2019
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall
not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned
magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute.

2)

The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in
the court’s final progression order (Filing No. 56) and their Rule 26(f) planning
report that are not inconsistent with this order.

3)

All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be
directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for
changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing
of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent
development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion,
which require that additional time be allowed.

Dated this 24th day of July, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge