Buttercase v. Frakes
Filing
42
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Habeas Petition (filing no. 41 ) is granted. Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus and For Dismissal Wit hout Prejudice (filing no. 37 ) is denied as moot. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Petitioner's Responsive Brief (filing no. 39 ) is granted. Petitioner's Responsive Brief shall be filed with the court on or befo re June 4, 2019. Petitioner's Objection to Respondent Filing a Reply Brief (filing no. 40 ) is denied. Respondents' Reply Brief shall be filed with the court on or before July 5, 2019. Petitioner's Motion for Expedited Ruling (filing no. 38 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOSEPH JUAN BUTTERCASE,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
SCOTT R. FRAKES, Director, Nebraska )
Department of Correctional Services,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
)
8:18CV131
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1)
Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw Habeas
Petition (filing no. 41) is granted.
(2)
Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of
Habeas Corpus and For Dismissal Without Prejudice (filing no. 37) is denied as moot.
(3)
Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Petitioner’s Responsive Brief
(filing no. 39) is granted. Petitioner’s Responsive Brief shall be filed with the court on or
before June 4, 2019.
(4)
denied.
Petitioner’s Objection to Respondent Filing a Reply Brief (filing no. 40) is
(5)
Respondents’ Reply Brief shall be filed with the court on or before July 5, 2019.
(6)
Petitioner’s Motion for Expedited Ruling (filing no. 38) is denied.
DATED this 1st day of April, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?