Hofer v. Aureus Nursing, LLC
Filing
18
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - granting Motion for Protective Order 17 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ELIZABETH HOFER,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 8:18cv163
v.
AUREUS NURSING, LLC,
JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
Defendant.
The parties agree that during the course of discovery it may be necessary to disclose
certain confidential information relating to the subject matter of this action. They agree that
certain categories of such information should be treated as confidential, protected from
disclosure outside this litigation, and used only for purposes of prosecuting or defending this
action and any appeals. The parties jointly request entry of this proposed Protective Order to
limit the disclosure, dissemination, and use of certain identified categories of confidential
information.
The parties assert in support of their request that protection of the identified categories
of confidential information is necessary because some of the discovery is anticipated to seek
personal information of nonparty employees and witnesses and proprietary business
information.
For good cause shown, the Court grants the parties’ Joint Motion for Protective Order
(Filing No. 17) and hereby enters the following Joint Stipulated Protective Order:
1.
Scope. All documents and materials produced in the course of discovery of this
case, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and
exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), are
subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as set forth below.
2.
Definition of Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential
Information” is defined as information that the producing or receiving party designates in good
faith has been previously maintained in a confidential manner and should be protected from
disclosure and use outside the litigation because its disclosure and use is restricted by statute
or could potentially cause harm to the interests of disclosing party or nonparties. For purposes
of this Order, the parties include the following categories of information or documents in the
definition of “Confidential Information”:
(a)
Financial and medical documents;
(b)
Non-party personnel files and records; and
(b)
Proprietary business documents.
Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as Confidential
Information.
3.
Form and Timing of Designation. The producing party may designate
documents as containing Confidential Information and therefore subject to protection under this
Order by marking or placing the words "CONFIDENTIAL" or “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER” (hereinafter “the marking”) on the document and on all copies in a
manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies”
includes electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions that contain the
Confidential Information. The marking will be applied prior to or at the time the documents are
produced or disclosed. Applying the marking to a document does not mean that the document
has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of
this Order. Copies that are made of any designated documents must also bear the marking,
except that indices, electronic databases, or lists of documents that do not contain substantial
portions or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the
substance of the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. By marking a
designated document as confidential, the designating attorney or party thereby certifies that the
2
document contains Confidential Information as defined in this Order.
4.
Depositions. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated
as such when the deposition is taken or within a reasonable time period after receipt of the
deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the portions of the transcript
and/or any exhibits to be protected.
5.
Protection of Confidential Material.
(a)
General Protections. Designated Confidential Information must be used
or disclosed solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this lawsuit, including any appeals,
or any other related legal proceeding brought by one of the parties to this litigation.
(b)
Who May View Designated Confidential Information. Except with the
prior written consent of the designating party or prior order of the court, designated Confidential
Information may only be disclosed to the following persons:
(i)
The parties to this litigation, including any employees, agents, and
representatives of the parties;
(ii)
Counsel for the parties and employees and agents of counsel;
(iii)
The court and court personnel, including any special master
appointed by the court, and members of the jury;
(iv)
Court reporters, recorders, and videographers engaged for
depositions;
(v)
Any mediator appointed by the court or jointly selected by the
parties;
(vi)
Any expert witness, outside consultant, or investigator retained
specifically in connection with this litigation, but only after such
person has been informed by counsel of the protective order and
acknowledged in writing that he or she has been provided a copy
of the protective order and agrees to abide by its terms as set
forth in Exhibit A.
(vii)
Any potential, anticipated, or actual fact witness and his or her
counsel, but only to the extent such confidential documents or
information will assist the witness in recalling, relating, or
explaining facts or in testifying, and only after such person has
been informed by counsel of the protective order and
acknowledged in writing that he or she has been provided a copy
3
of the protective order and agrees to abide by its terms as set
forth in Exhibit A.
(viii)
The author or recipient of the document (not including a person
who received the document in the course of the litigation);
(ix)
Independent providers of document reproduction, electronic
discovery, or other litigation services retained or employed
specifically in connection with this litigation; and
(x)
Other persons only upon consent of the producing party and on
such conditions as the parties may agree.
(c)
Control of Documents. The parties must take reasonable efforts to
prevent unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of documents designated as containing
Confidential Information pursuant to the terms of this Order. Counsel for the parties must
maintain a record of all persons who have reviewed or been given access to the documents.
This record shall not be discoverable by the opposing party unless good cause is shown for
such disclosure.
6.
Filing of Confidential Information. In the event a party seeks to file any
document containing Confidential Information subject to protection under this Order with the
court, that party must take appropriate action to insure that the document receives proper
protection from public disclosure including: (a) filing a redacted document with the consent of
the party who designated the document as confidential; (b) where appropriate (e.g., in relation
to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the document solely for in camera review; or
(c) when the preceding measures are inadequate, seeking permission to file the document
under restricted access by filing a motion for leave to file under restricted access.
Nothing in this Order will be construed as a prior directive to allow any document to be
filed under seal or restrictive access. The parties understand that the requested documents
may be filed under seal or restricted access only with the permission of the court after proper
motion. If the motion is granted and the requesting party permitted to file the requested
4
documents under restricted access, only counsel of record and unrepresented parties will have
access to the documents.
7.
Challenges to a Confidential Designation. The designation of any material or
document as Confidential Information is subject to challenge by any party. Before filing any
motion or objection to a confidential designation, the objecting party must meet and confer in
good faith to resolve the objection informally without judicial intervention. A party that elects to
challenge a confidentiality designation may file and serve a motion that identifies the challenged
material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. The burden of proving the necessity
of a confidentiality designation remains with the party asserting confidentiality. Unless and until
the Court rules favorably on the challenge, all parties must continue to treat the materials as
Confidential Information under the terms of this Order.
8.
Use of Confidential Documents or Information at Trial or Hearing. Nothing
in this Order will be construed to affect the use of any document, material, or information at any
trial or hearing. A party that intends to present or that anticipates that another party may
present Confidential Information at a hearing or trial must bring that issue to the attention of the
court and the other parties without disclosing the Confidential Information. The court may
thereafter make such orders as are necessary to govern the use of such documents or
information at the hearing or trial.
9.
Obligations on Conclusion of Litigation.
(a)
Order Remains in Effect. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered, all
provisions of this Order will remain in effect and continue to be binding after conclusion of the
litigation.
(b)
Return of Confidential Documents. Within forty-five (45) days after this
litigation concludes by settlement, final judgment, or final order, including all appeals, all
documents designated as containing Confidential Information, including copies as defined
above, must be returned to the party who previously produced the document unless: (1) the
5
document has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure; (2) the
parties agree to destruction of the document to the extent practicable in lieu of return; or (3) as
to documents bearing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving
party, that party elects to destroy the documents and certifies to the producing party in writing
that it has done so. Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel for each party is permitted to retain
a complete copy of Confidential Information for a period of two years (or longer if made
reasonably necessary by the assertion of an actual claim) for the purpose of defending a
malpractice suit.
(c)
Retention of Work Product. Notwithstanding the above requirements to
return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product, including an index
which refers or relates to designated Confidential Information, so long as that work product does
not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text or images of designated documents. This
work product will continue to be confidential under this Order. An attorney may use his or her
own work product in subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose Confidential
Information.
10.
Order Subject to Modification. This Order is subject to modification by the
court on its own motion or on motion of any party or any other person with standing concerning
the subject matter. The Order must not, however, be modified until the parties have been given
notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification.
11.
No Prior Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the
representations and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery.
Nothing in this Order will be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any
document or material designated as Confidential Information by counsel or the parties is entitled
to protection until such time as the court may rule on a specific document or issue.
12.
Persons Bound by Protective Order. This Order will take effect when entered
and is binding upon all counsel of record and their law firms, the parties, and persons made
6
subject to this Order by its terms.
13.
Jurisdiction. The court’s jurisdiction regarding this Order will terminate on the
final disposition of this case; provided, however, that any party may file a motion seeking leave
to reopen the case to enforce the provisions of this Order for good cause shown.
14.
Applicability to Parties Later Joined. If additional persons or entities become
parties to this lawsuit, they must not be given access to any Confidential Information until they
execute and file with the court their written agreement to be bound by the provisions of this
Order.
15.
Protections Extended to Third Party Confidential Information. The parties
agree to extend the provisions of this Protective Order to Confidential Information produced in
this case by third parties, if timely requested by the third party or by the parties to this litigation.
16.
Confidential Information Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other
Litigation. If a receiving party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation
that would compel disclosure of any material or document designated in this action as
Confidential Information, the receiving party must so notify the designating party, in writing,
immediately and in no event more than three (3) business days after receiving the subpoena or
order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.
The receiving party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the
subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. In addition, the receiving party must deliver a
copy of this Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the subpoena to issue.
The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested persons to the existence
of this Order and to afford the designating party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its
Confidential Information in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The designating
party bears the burden and the expense of seeking protection in that court of its Confidential
Information, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging
7
a receiving party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. The obligations
set forth in this paragraph remain in effect while the party has in its possession, custody, or
control Confidential Information designated by the other party to this case.
17.
Privileged or Work Product Information.
(a)
The production of attorney-client privileged or work-product protected
electronically stored information (“ESI”) or paper documents, whether disclosed
inadvertently or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from
discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Protective
Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal
Rule of Evidence 502(d). Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to
limit a party’s right to conduct a review of documents, ESI or information
(including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of
privileged and/or protected information before production.
(b)
Any party who discloses documents that are privileged or otherwise immune from
discovery shall promptly upon discovery of such disclosure, advise the Receiving
Party and request that the documents be returned. The Receiving Party shall
return such produced documents or certify their destruction, including all copies,
within 14 days of receiving such a written request. The party returning such
produced documents may thereafter seek re-production of any such documents
pursuant to applicable law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 16th day of November, 2018
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
8
EXHIBIT A
WRITTEN ASSURANCE
I, the undersigned, do hereby acknowledge that I have read the Stipulation for Protective
Order and the Protective Order entered by the Court in the action of Elizabeth Hofer v. Aureus
Nursing, LLC, and hereby covenant, warrant and agree: (1) to abide in full by its terms regarding
the confidentiality of the Confidential Material, as that term is defined in the Stipulation for
Protective Order, which I am being provided, and that I will not disclose or cause to be disclosed
such Confidential Material to any person not permitted to receive or otherwise access such
information under the Stipulation for Protective Order, (2) that such Confidential Material should
be used only for purposes necessary for the litigation of the claims between and among the
parties to the action of Elizabeth Hofer v. Aureus Nursing, LLC and not for any other purpose,
whether business or otherwise, and (3) that I will return all Confidential Material that I receive
upon my having served the purpose which caused me to receive the Confidential Material in
accordance with the provisions of the Stipulation for Protective Order.
Dated this
day of
20
.
By:
[Signature]
[Printed Name]
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?