Witchet v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Filing
75
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA - that Defendant's Unopposed Motion (Filing No. 72 ) is granted. If Dr. Zaidi fails to comply with the attached subpoena, Defendant may seek contempt sanctions against Dr. Zaidi, including reimbursement for all costs and fees incurred as a result of Dr. Zaidi's previous cancellations. The Court hereby orders Dr. Zaidi to comply with the subpoena and appear for a deposition on June 27, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MARCUS WITCHET,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
CASE NO. 8:18-cv-00187
ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
SUBPOENA
Defendant.
Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Defendant”) has filed an unopposed
Motion for an Order requiring Dr. Syed F. Zaidi to comply with a subpoena and appear
for a deposition on June 27, 2019. (Filing No. 72.) The Court finds that Dr. Zaidi has
previously failed to comply with three separate subpoenas issued by the Defendant. As
a result of Dr. Zaidi’s failure to appear for his deposition, Defendant has incurred hundreds
of dollars in cancellation fees from the court reporter, an amount that will likely grow.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion (Filing No.72) is granted. If
Dr. Zaidi fails to comply with the attached subpoena, Defendant may seek contempt
sanctions against Dr. Zaidi, including reimbursement for all costs and fees incurred as a
result of Dr. Zaidi’s previous cancellations. The Court hereby orders Dr. Zaidi to comply
with the subpoena and appear for a deposition on June 27, 2019.
Dated this 10th day of June, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?