Sailors v. US Marshals Service Dept. et al

Filing 47

ORDER - that the parties shall have until June 21, 2019, to show cause why Sailors v. Keyes et al, 8:18CV189 (D. Neb. 2018) and Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al, 8:19CV01 (D. Neb. 2019) should not be consolidated for all purposes. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA THOMAS D. SAILORS, Plaintiff, 8:18CV189 vs. ORDER DANIEL KEYES, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL KEYES, US Marshal #3483, MAXWELL HUBKA, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1655, and COLE JENNINGS, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1650, in their Individual Capacities, Defendants. THOMAS D. SAILORS, 8:19CV01 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICES, and WILL IVERSON, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on its own motion. It appears to the Court that the above captioned cases are related. The Court has reviewed the filings in both cases and it appears the cases may be consolidated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), as both cases arise out of the same set of facts and are based on similar, if not identical, allegations. See EEOC v. HBE Corp., 135 F.3d 543, 551 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have until June 21, 2019, to show cause why Sailors v. Keyes et al, 8:18CV189 (D. Neb. 2018) and Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al, 8:19CV01 (D. Neb. 2019) should not be consolidated for all purposes. Dated this 5th day of June, 2019. BY THE COURT: s/ Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?