Sailors v. US Marshals Service Dept. et al
Filing
47
ORDER - that the parties shall have until June 21, 2019, to show cause why Sailors v. Keyes et al, 8:18CV189 (D. Neb. 2018) and Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al, 8:19CV01 (D. Neb. 2019) should not be consolidated for all purposes. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. (KLF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
THOMAS D. SAILORS,
Plaintiff,
8:18CV189
vs.
ORDER
DANIEL KEYES, SPECIAL
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF
PAUL KEYES, US Marshal #3483,
MAXWELL HUBKA, City of Lincoln Police
Ofc. #1655, and COLE JENNINGS, City of
Lincoln Police Ofc. #1650, in their Individual
Capacities,
Defendants.
THOMAS D. SAILORS,
8:19CV01
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICES, and WILL
IVERSON,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on its own motion. It appears to the Court that the above
captioned cases are related. The Court has reviewed the filings in both cases and it appears the cases
may be consolidated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), as both cases arise out of the same set of facts
and are based on similar, if not identical, allegations. See EEOC v. HBE Corp., 135 F.3d 543, 551
(8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have until June 21, 2019, to show cause why Sailors
v. Keyes et al, 8:18CV189 (D. Neb. 2018) and Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al, 8:19CV01 (D.
Neb. 2019) should not be consolidated for all purposes.
Dated this 5th day of June, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?