Mumin v. Douglas County, Nebraska et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's "Request for Relief from Judgment as an Independent Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 60(d)(1)" (filing no. 16 ), construed as a motion, is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DUKHAN MUMIN,
Petitioner,
8:18CV271
vs.
DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA,
and STATE OF NEBRASKA,
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Respondents.
This closed federal habeas matter is before the court on Petitioner Dukhan
Mumin’s (“Petitioner” or “Mumin”) “Request for Relief from Judgment as an
Independent Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 60(d)(1)” which the court
construes as a motion. (Filing No. 16.) Mumin’s motion challenges the court’s
decisions which “left in place a judgment originating from the Lancaster County
District Court in case number CR11-954, from filings in this Court under
4:17cv3164, 4:04-cv-3058, 4:16cv3033, and 8:18-cv-271.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 1, ¶
4.) However, the conviction Mumin challenged in his petition (filing no. 1) was a
conviction in case number 144 878 in the District Court of Douglas County,
Nebraska and is, thus, wholly unrelated to the subject of the present motion. Upon
consideration,
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Request for Relief from Judgment as an
Independent Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. Rule 60(d)(1)” (filing no. 16),
construed as a motion, is denied.
Dated this 5th day of February, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?