Ribbing v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 54

ORDER on the parties Stipulation for Dismissal of this case with prejudice 52 . The court being advised in the premises finds that such an Order is proper. This action be dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 46 ) and Defendant's Motions in Limine (Filing Nos. 48 and 50 ) be dismissed as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)

8:18-cv-00509-JFB-CRZ Doc # 54 Filed: 10/15/20 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 861

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CAROL RIBBING, as the personal
representative of the Estate of Gregory
Ribbing, deceased;

8:18CV509

Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal (Filing
No. 53) of this case with prejudice. The Court being advised in the premises finds that
such an Order is proper.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be
dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Filing No. 46) and Defendant’s Motions in Limine (Filing Nos. 48 and 50) be dismissed
as moot.

Dated this 15th day of October, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge