Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arisebank et al

Filing 2

COPY of ORDER from USDC - Northern District of Texas Dallas Division appointing Mark W. Rasmussen as receiver of AriseBank. Ordered by Unassigned Judge. (LKO)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-00186-M Document 72 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 2 PagelD 1159 FILE D URT U.~- O\S1rff\C E~~ i ~t A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT co~ t RICl v . ~ ~PR \ \ u rl ' :.. v, FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TE~ DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ARISEBANK, JARED RICE SR., and STANLEY FORD, Defendants. M'1 9i 54 . f .... '- 1 f\ L. ,JL i..-1 • • § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-0186-M § § § § 8: I8Mc8~ ___________________§ ORDER Before the Court is the Motion for Reappointment of the Receiver [ECF No. 71], filed by the Receiver. On January 25 , 2018, the Court entered an Order Appointing Recei ver [ECF No. 12] that named Mark W . Rasmussen as Receiver for the Defendants. The Receiver informed the Court that after the expiration of ten days from the date of the issuance of the Order Appointing Receiver, the Receiver identified Receivership Assets located in a number of other federal districts. In order to comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 754 and to confer jurisdiction upon this Court of all Receivership Assets, regardless of their location, the Receiver filed the Motion. The Court, having considered the Motion and relevant case law, concludes that the Motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Mark W. Rasmussen is REAPPOINTED as Receiver in these proceedings as to all those entities and individuals for which he has been acting as Receiver. This reappointment incorporates all of the provisions set forth in the Order Appointing Receiver [ECF No. 12]. Case 3:18-cv-00186-M Document 72 Filed 04/05/18 SO ORDERED . April 5, 2018. 2 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 1160

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?