Dortch v. Bliemeister et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that Plaintiff's correspondence, construed as a motion for extension of time (filing no. 14 ), is denied as moot. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in Plaintiff's case is for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LKO)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOSHUA DORTCH,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFF BLIEMEISTER, Chief of Police;
ARMSTRONG, I.D. #1257; BETTS,
I.D. #1158; CRONIN, I.D. #1347;
RYAN, Property Agent, I.D. #
Unknown; CAMPBELL, Property
Agent, I.D. # Unknown; SCHAAF,
Property Agent, I.D. # Unknown;
CITTA, I.D. #340; JOHN D.
HALLOCK, FBI Agent SA; FBI
OMAHA DIVISION, and JOHN DOE,
An and All Other;

8:19CV175
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

Defendants.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s correspondence, which the court
construes as a motion for an extension of time to pay his initial partial filing fee.
(Filing No. 14.) The court’s records reflect that Plaintiff paid his initial partial
filing fee on or about May 13, 2019. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s correspondence, construed as a motion for
extension of time (filing no. 14), is denied as moot. Plaintiff is advised that the
next step in Plaintiff’s case is for the court to conduct an initial review of
Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28
U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of
business.

Dated this 1st day of July, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

2