Barber v. Frakes et al
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Clerk of the Court is directed to complete a new summons form and a USM-285 form for service of process on Defendant Dr. Jason Ourada, in his individual capacity, using this address: Dr. Jason Ourada, Psychiatry Clinic at P oynter Hall, 510 S. 42nd St., Omaha, NE 68131. The Clerk shall then forward these completed forms, together with a copy of the Second Amended Complaint (Filing 14 ), the court's April 28, 2021 Memorandum and Order (Filing 15 ), and this Memor andum and Order, to the Marshals Service for service upon Dr. Jason Ourada by certified mail or other authorized method. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-508.01(1). The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKO)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RAYSEAN BARBER,
Plaintiff,
8:20CV282
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCOTT FRAKES, DR. BRANDON
HOLLISTER,
DR.
JEFFREY
KASSELMAN, DR. NATALIE BAKER,
DR. MEREDITH GRIFFIN, DR. SEAN
SEARS, and DR. JASON OURADA,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court for case management. On April 28, 2021, the
court entered a Memorandum and Order (Filing 15) authorizing service of process.
On May 19, 2021, the summons issued to Defendant Dr. Jason Ourada was
returned unexecuted. (Filing 23.) Upon further investigation and consultation with
the Marshals Service,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to complete a new summons form
and a USM-285 form for service of process on Defendant Dr. Jason Ourada, in his
individual capacity, using this address:
Dr. Jason Ourada
Psychiatry Clinic at Poynter Hall
510 S. 42nd St.
Omaha, NE 68131
The Clerk shall then forward these completed forms, together with a copy of the
Second Amended Complaint (Filing 14), the court’s April 28, 2021 Memorandum
and Order (Filing 15), and this Memorandum and Order, to the Marshals Service
for service upon Dr. Jason Ourada by certified mail or other authorized method.1
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-508.01(1).
2.
The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without
prepayment of fees from Plaintiff.
Dated this 7th day of June, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
1
Pro se litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are entitled to rely on service by the
United States Marshals Service. Wright v. First Student, Inc., 710 F.3d 782, 783 (8th Cir.
2013). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), in an in forma pauperis case, “[t]he officers of
the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases.” See
Moore v. Jackson, 123 F.3d 1082, 1085 (8th Cir. 1997) (language in § 1915(d) is
compulsory). See, e.g., Beyer v. Pulaski County Jail, 589 Fed. Appx. 798 (8th Cir. 2014)
(unpublished) (vacating district court order of dismissal for failure to prosecute and
directing district court to order the Marshal to seek defendant’s last-known contact
information where plaintiff contended that the Jail would have information for
defendant’s whereabouts); Graham v. Satkoski, 51 F.3d 710, 713 (7th Cir. 1995) (when
court instructs Marshal to serve papers for prisoner, prisoner need furnish no more than
information necessary to identify defendant; Marshal should be able to ascertain
defendant’s current address).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?